NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 7, 12, 29 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 AND RULE 11 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

NAME

MOBILE NO.

E-MAIL I’D

RANJEET KUMAR

83830984789667769795

rk@courtkutchehry.com

JAI THAKUR

81307033349355723300

jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com

RAJEEV RANJAN

9334553249

rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com

ASHOK MISHRA

9718327746

sales@courtkutchehry.com

RAVI KUMAR


ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

In Re_ Ghanshyam Das Mundra, Resolution Professional Of Karuturi Global Limited Vs., (2020) 07 NCLT CK 0082

NCLT allowed the application filed by the resolution Professional of the applicant U/s 12 of IBC, 2016 R/w Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, by inter alia seeking to exclude the period of 60 days from the computation of the Corporate Insolvency and Resolution Process (CIRP) period of Corporate Debtor, in the interest of justice and equity. While allowing the application NCLT held that we find from the Application that the RP has diligently carried out his duties in calling for Expressions of Interest ('EOIs') from Prospective Resolution Applicants ('PRAs') and has thus far received EOIs from three such applicants. Others have also shown interest. However, his work was stalled for legitimate reasons namely that w.e.f. 25.03.2020 the Central Government declared a nationwide lockdown and prohibited all non-essential activities in response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We are convinced that these circumstances justify the exclusion of time as prayed for and are in accordance with the decision of the Hon'ble NCLAT referred to above. We are also of the view that by allowing the time as prayed for, the RP would get the requisite time to complete the CIRP as per the Rules laid down in this regard, and be able to maximize the value of assets and serve the interest of the creditors better, and no prejudice would be caused to anyone by allowing the same.

Comments